James Casbere and Thomas Demand
Hofer uses empty room's in her work photographing the whole space with out a soul in sight. The work is eerie but at the same time interesting with a strong use of symmetry to encapsulating the rooms that she looks at, many of them happen to be places of work or leaning such as libraries and offices.
Candida Höfer - Johnen Galerie Berlin |
While reading through chapter two of Charrlote Cottons The Photograph as Contemporary art, James Casbere jumped out as being very similar to that of Candida Hofer. Due to the absence of people in both their work and the use of architectural spaces.
He investigates the idea of large spaces with all the traces of people beaning removed. (wirrtier / date)
In this seance their works are ver similar.
However Casbere's work is different in a vital way to that of Hofer. His spaces as replicas of the real spaces that he had been to. Instead of creating the idea of space Casbere floods many of them to give the feeling of disorientation and claustrophobia.
James Casebere - Monticello #3 2001 |
Thomas Demand - Drafting Room 1996 |
Take this for example if you were to see a Demamd image and a Hofer would you believe that one of really while the other is staged, or would you believe that both were the real authentic setting? What makes you beilive Hofers images more then Demand for example, the scale of Hofers images is a very big give away that they are taken on location. However with Casbere this is not the case, his images are very convincing, if it was not for the water and finaly Demand his images are convincing to the eye even though they are constructed from cardboard and paper, but the use of imperfections allows us not to be fooled by his images and many other artists work.
No comments:
Post a Comment